H
hammervice
Guest
they cut me man they cut me
uncut. I am totally against circision, whether it's man or woman. If you cut it off you have less fun and need lots of lube. That's why most european man are happier, than others.
![]()
uncut. I am totally against circision, whether it's man or woman. If you cut it off you have less fun and need lots of lube. That's why most european man are happier, than others.
![]()
What would make a person want to start circision boys
how did this start , and who got the ideal
is there a way to reverse circision?
There is a procedure called a "Foreskin Restoration" that involves stretching the skin back out to cover the glands, but it's still not the same...
Man, your answers are almost as long as the last book I read. You must be a teacher, priest or professor. First of all a tradition of thousand years doesn't make it right. Secondly your comparison with the Nazis is much worse than my assertion. It's about human rights and I want, that every body has the right to enjoy the inch of skin, which makes it pleasant to masturbate. You are circised, you don't know how it is to be uncir
cised. You prefer cir
cised dicks, that's what you like. I am uncir
cised, I love it, and I prefer uncir
cised men. That's what I like. It's a question of taste.
Don't get me started on piercings and tatoos. That wasn't the question in this thread. By the way I am not pierced and I don't have tattoos on my skin. You and your prejudices... Actually my hypothesis is confirmed by your answer. Thank you for that. You got issues, man. X(
Your statement about muslims being uncut is not strictly true. Most muslims of African descent are CirFirst of all, circision dates back many thousands of years. It predates the story in the old testament by thousands of years. It was a right of passage in very ancient times.
Secondly, who's to say European men are quantitatively any happier than any other group of men? I believe the vast majority of African men are uncircised as well as the indigenous men of South America (as well as the colonial Europeans there), the Pacific Islands, Asia and all Muslims throughout the world.
Your comment smacks of Aryan supremacy. During the Nazi reign of terror throughout Europe a sure fire way to determine if a man were of Hebrew descent was to inspect for circision.
Your words are weapons that can cause harm to others if not chosen wisely.
I am circised. I prefer the appearance of cir
cised penises. It is more aesthetically pleasing to me. As far as using more lube (HA!! LOL) that is just ludicrous. I prefer LESS lube than cir
cised men I have known. It is true that the head of a cir
cised penis is desensitized from being exposed to air and clothing. Therefore, I prefer less lube so there is more friction and that increases pleasure for me.
Having debunked your entire hypothesis I will close in saying that circision is a practice that supposedly promotes better hygiene for men and is seen by some religions as a covenant with the Almighty that is sacred to some. If my parents had asked my permission to have the procedure done on me I would have flatly refused because I am such a wuss, lol. I also don't have any tattoos or piercings (which I find it odd that you didn't mention that practice in your little diatribe) because I am a wuss and I don't like pain.
I hope you learn from this experience that you should think before you speak. I don't mean to sound aggressive towards you but I thought you might need a little scolding for being so brash with you opinions.
jl2