-
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access.
By joining you will gain full access to thousands of Videos, Pictures & Much More.
Membership is absolutely FREE and registration is FAST & SIMPLE so please, Register Today and join one of the friendliest communities on the net!
You must be at least 18 years old to legally access this forum. -
Hello Guest,
Thanks for remaining an active member on GayHeaven. We hope you've enjoyed the forum so far.
Our records indicate that you have not posted on our forums in several weeks. Why not dismiss this notice & make your next post today by doing one of the following:
- General Discussion Area - Engage in a conversation with other members.
- Gay Picture Collections - Share any pictures you may have collected from blogs and other sites. Don't know how to post? Click HERE to visit our easy 3-steps tutorial for picture posting.
- Show Yourself Off - Brave enough to post your own pictures or videos? Let us see, enjoy & comment on that for you.
- Gay Clips - Start sharing hot video clips you may have. Don't know how to get started? Click HERE to view our detailed tutorial for video posting.
Active and contributing members will earn special ranks. Click HERE to view the full list of ranks & privileges given to active members & how you can easily obtain them.
Please do not flood the forum with "Thank you" posts. Instead, please use the "thanks button"
We Hope you enjoy the forum & thanks for your efforts!
The GayHeaven Team.
Do you agree with the Dr.Conrad Murray Verdict?
- Thread starter rick71142
- Start date
betomartinez
New member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2011
- Messages
- 8
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
He didn't kill Jackson but rather allowed a dangerous scenario wherein it was very possible. As MJ's physician he was obligated to provide a safe medical environment but failed. He wasn't convicted of murder, but rather involuntary manslaughter. The conviction was appropriate.
topdog
Super Vip
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 2,400
- Reaction score
- 663
- Points
- 128
Here's the situation: MJ shopped around until he got the doctor that would give him what he wanted, then he paid him handsomely to do it.
Jackson is primarily responsible for his death. No one forced him to take the drugs. He demanded them.
However, doctors need to know that in the end, if everything goes wrong, it doesn't matter how many waivers you've had your client sign taking on the risk - if your client dies because you administered a potentially lethal drug in an off-label use then you are going to prison. Weigh that very carefully against the extra cash that the celebrity is willing to pay.
Jackson is primarily responsible for his death. No one forced him to take the drugs. He demanded them.
However, doctors need to know that in the end, if everything goes wrong, it doesn't matter how many waivers you've had your client sign taking on the risk - if your client dies because you administered a potentially lethal drug in an off-label use then you are going to prison. Weigh that very carefully against the extra cash that the celebrity is willing to pay.
jeansGuyOZ
Smartarse from Down Under
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2010
- Messages
- 2,079
- Reaction score
- 92
- Points
- 0
Where is the poll option for "it's not for me to say guilty or not guilty, because I wasn't at the hearing and didn't have access to all the evidence and testimony that the judge and jury had."?
We don't decide on an accused person's guilt or innocence by polling the general public, and thank goodness for that.
We don't decide on an accused person's guilt or innocence by polling the general public, and thank goodness for that.
JonnyFantastico
Super Vip
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2008
- Messages
- 2,539
- Reaction score
- 229
- Points
- 63
Sadly, I'm actually stuck between it. While I do believe that Dr. Murray was definitely negligent in his actions and may have lit the fuse that eventually made Michael explode hypothetically, one has to look at it from a wider view. This wasn't the only time that the public heard of Michael's fondness for certain drugs.
It ended up reminding me of the very sad cir
stances with Anna Nicole Smith: if Dr. Murray wasn't the one to provide Michael with those drugs, another doctor would've easily seen another side of Michael's fame and provided him with what we wanted... I think it's sad overall: fans lost their icon, a family lost their son, brother and father and a doctor who seemed to have a close following with his patients has lost his right to practice medicine.
There are no winners here.
It ended up reminding me of the very sad cir
stances with Anna Nicole Smith: if Dr. Murray wasn't the one to provide Michael with those drugs, another doctor would've easily seen another side of Michael's fame and provided him with what we wanted... I think it's sad overall: fans lost their icon, a family lost their son, brother and father and a doctor who seemed to have a close following with his patients has lost his right to practice medicine.There are no winners here.
Similar threads
- Poll
- Poll
