Frottage and intercrural sex

[Turtle2345]

Has anybody ever tried either of these? If so did you like it?

I want to try them but my BF thinks that they don't sound very pleasurable.

 

[Jase]

Since I wasn't familiar with the second term, I had to preform an internet image search and had no idea that's what it was called. LOL

Many, many moons ago when I was young and in high school, my boyfriend and I use to do both of these regularly. We both seemed to enjoy ourselves, until we finally started going all the way with anal sex, and then there was no going back at that point.

 

[dragonscub]

The answer is the same as to almost any other question in the world: "it depends".

If either partner is totally hooked on the specific feeling of anal sex, any kind of frot activity is likely to disappoint. You are simply rubbing against each other in hopes of a "friction orgasm" - there is no sensation of penetration or immersion grip, as with anal or oral. Whether you can get off from this satisfactorily depends on several factors.

Very young gays or closeted married guys can easily get off from frot activity because they are so mentally turned on just by being with another man that ANY contact will trigger an orgasm. More experienced gay partners might find frot exciting if done at times or locations where full-on sex may not be practical (outdoors, in public places, in a car, while visiting friends or relatives, etc): in such cases, the thrill of getting off "inappropriately" can make frot seem hotter than it might at home. As the saying goes: sexuality is centered in the mind, not the genitals- if you're mentally turned on by a situation, you can get off from any activity.

My personal experience with frot has been mostly good. As I noted in a similar thread, I very much get off on "fake fucking": pumping between my partners butt cheeks (and vice versa). The intercrural form of frot you asked about is a different story: I don't care for that at all. My partner likes topping me that way, but I find it very uncomfortable: I need to press my thighs together very firmly to give him any sensation, he thrusts for a very long time, and the vigorous rubbing quickly becomes unpleasant for me because he has a thick cock and I am rather hairy. My thigh muscles often end up irritated, which kind of ruins the rest of my day. I have no interest in topping between anyone's thighs myself, either: that specific friction annoys me. But I'll happily thrust against anywhere else (chest, stomach, butt, leg, foot) .

Naturally smooth twinks or studs with no body hair would probably enjoy intercrural bottoming much more than I do, and a top who is less demanding of thigh pressure would likely be more fun to accommodate. The face to face aspect of intercrural is quite nice, and the only reason I put up with my partner's occasional requests for it. Watching his expression as he nears orgasm almost makes my discomfort worthwhile.

 

[jeansGuyOZ]

I had to look up "intercrural" too.

Yes I've done that a few times, though not lately. Usually it has taken the form of me being the one "penetrated". A couple of times it has arisen because I was on top of the other, he had his penis between my thighs and was clearly intent on inserting it into my arsehole, and me not wanting to do that, rather than say "no thanks" I would reach around and move his dick so that he was effectively fucking my thighs and my arse cheeks, rather than the hole. I would squeeze the glutes together as they did so. They seemed to find that pleasurable, a couple of them said it was as good as a real fuck, and one guy actually thought he was fucking me proper, so I must have done something right!

 

[Jonny]

I had to search for both terms. lol :blushing: