Thank you GB - very, very good written. Policital correctness very often has odd ideas!
You know a chocolate covered marshmallow? The age old German term for it is NEGERKUSS (Negro-kiss). But that is now officially banned. You have to say now SCHOKOKUSS (Chocolate-kiss) or SCHAUMKUSS (Foam-kiss). The newest nonsense is the ZIGEUNERSCHNITZEL (Gypsy-escalope). Because the term ZIGEUNER (Gipsy) is a banned one we shall call it now BALKANSCHNITZEL!
Yes you can laugh - but sometimes I want to cry about such an enacted insanity!
I'm not sure the examples you picked are particuarlly good ones. Racial slurs are not the same thing as honest descriptions!
Black is a colour that exists in the world. It can be used to describe things. Negro did not start life as a racial slur, but thanks to centuries of attrocities, it has become one. I don't see a problem with moving away from names that contain racial slurs.
The meanings of words shift over time. Something which was innocent a century ago is not necessarily still OK today.
Given the word's baggage, I'm OK with re-naming a NegroKiss to a ChocolateKiss - the latter is just as descriptive, and free from racial slurs.
I have a much bigger problem with basic descriptie words becoming taboo. Black is nota slur, it is a VERY common colour, and a VERY common word!
There was a time a decade or so ago when there was a genuine push to stop usinh the words "blackboard" and "whiteboard". That's the kind of thing I have a big problem with.
Now - if someone started to call them niggerboards and crackerboards, then, frankly, I'd be all in favour of telling that person to stop being a prick!
Not all labels are the same - some have centuries of baggage!
B.