what do you want in vid size?

[Thor]

I just converted a 700mb vid down to 112mb, but some vid quality is missing, but to me its better to have one small vid to dl than to have 6 separate links to dl...lol

what do you think?

 

[Bo.]

:thinking: I dunno what to say.

I have said many times that I prefer separated playable scenes than full 700MB video.

Now, you have done something else, converted whole 700MB video in a smaller size video. It's not bad idea if the video quality is not too bad. That's my opinion

 

[Thor]

ya bo, its good quality, at least i like it...lol

 

[Lamicheval]

I prefer the smaller vids too. In both ways. Even if the quality isn't the best all the time, we have the chance to see more of the hot shots.

 

[brmstn69]

With the monsterous sized hard drives, High end graphics, and HD monitors that most newer computers have, I think that quality is most important, I don't want to have to reduce the window down to 1/4 size to get a clear picture, while the smaller file might be great for I-Pod's and other portable devices, I still preferr the larger high quility ones.

 

[XMan101]

I agree with Kevin, I love being able to put it on my full screen and sit and ....well you know the rest

 

[Thor]

I just posted one that i shrunk from 350mbs to 55mb, so take a look and tell me what you think

it didn't look like the quality suffered to much to me...lol

http://www.gayboyporn.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10041

 

[Bo.]

It doesn't look too bad.

 

[ritsuka]

I generally prefer good quality, but seperate scenes as opposed to really big .rar's. And if were talking about porn, I think it's always sexier full screen.

 

[XMan101]

I rarely get further than 10 mins anyway LOL

 

[slimjim]

The higher quality the better...if that mean 1.4Gb in 14 files ....so be it

 

[raisinboy]

Don't laugh, but I will only hassle with files over 1 GB if I'm really interested in the storyline.
For a quick wank a small 100 MB file is more than enough.