Blackmail is the crime of threatening to reveal substantially true information about a person to the public, a family member, or associates unless a demand made upon the victim is met. This information is usually of an embarrassing, socially damaging, and/or incriminating nature. As the information is substantially true, the act of revealing the information may not be criminal in its own right nor amount to a civil law defamation; the crime is making demands in exchange for withholding it.
The Law
Section 100A of the Crimes Act states:
1. Whosoever with intent to cause gain for himself or herself or any other person, or with intent to procure for himself or herself or any other person any appointment or office, or with intent to cause loss to any person:
(a) makes any unwarranted demand, and
(b) supports that demand by making:
(i) any unwarranted threat to publish,
(ii) any unwarranted proposal to abstain from publishing, or
(iii) any unwarranted offer to prevent the publication of,
any matter or thing concerning any person (whether living or dead), shall be liable to imprisonment for ten years.
2. For the purposes of this section:
(a) "publish"means communicate to any person,
(b) a demand is unwarranted unless the person making it does so in the belief that he or she has reasonable grounds for making it,
(c) a threat, proposal or offer in support of a demand is unwarranted unless the person making it does so in the belief that it is a proper means of supporting the demand,
(d) "gain"means gain in money or other property, whether temporary or permanent, and includes a gain by keeping what one has, as well as a gain by getting what one has not, and
(e) "loss"means loss in money or other property, whether temporary or permanent, and includes a loss by not getting what one might get, as well as a loss by parting with what one has.
In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt.
1. The accused made an unwarranted demand.
2. It was made with intent to cause gain for himself or herself or any other person, or with intent to procure for himself or herself or any other person any appointment or office, or with intent to cause loss to any person.
3. The demand was supported by making any unwarranted threat to publish, or any unwarranted proposal to abstain from publishing, or any unwarranted offer to prevent the publication of, any matter or thing concerning any person (whether living or dead).
So lets review...
In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt.
1. The accused made an unwarranted demand.
You being the victim, it is not unwarranted that you want no contact with him...
2. It was made with intent to cause gain for himself or herself or any other person, or with intent to procure for himself or herself or any other person any appointment or office, or with intent to cause loss to any person.
There is no money or property involved, nor any appointment or office. The only loss to him would be his hunting grounds...
3. The demand was supported by making any unwarranted threat to publish, or any unwarranted proposal to abstain from publishing, or any unwarranted offer to prevent the publication of, any matter or thing concerning any person (whether living or dead).
Again, the threat is warranted, he has committed a crime against you, and may do so against others...
So it's not really blackmail, and not a crime...
also pay attention to this part...
(b) a demand is unwarranted unless the person making it does so in the belief that he or she has reasonable grounds for making it,
Again, even if you were almost 18, he still committed a crime. Since you were the victim you have reasonable grounds for demanding he leave. Also if you suspect that he is also committing the same crime against others it is not an unreasonable demand. In fact, if you know or suspect that he is committing a crime, you may be legally obligated to report him...
And to those who have said "get over it, you were almost legal and old enough to know what you were doing" I'd like to point out that it appears his distress is due to his suspicion that this man is targeting other boys, some only 14 or 15, more so than because of what was done to him...:no: