topdog
Super Vip
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 2,400
- Reaction score
- 663
- Points
- 128
Movies
New York, New York
Great performances, great songs, and a strong directorial style should have made Martin Scorsese's 1977 film musical New York, New York a hit - or at least a critical success. It begins as a meet-cute post-war romantic comedy and then develops into a backstage musical with a familiar rags-to-riches / price-of-fame arc.
But for all it's abundant talent and craft the film sinks with a protagonist so abusive, insecure, and selfish that audiences preferred to flee the theater than spend two and a half hours in the presence of jazz sax player Jimmy Doyle (Robert DiNiro). Think of his Travis Bickle character from Taxi Driver in a musical and you won't be far off track.
But with that rather big negative out of the way, the film has so much to offer. The film looks beautiful, and the sets are a Hollywood version of New York - similar to what you would see in MGM and Warner Brothers musicals of the time. It's ambitious, audacious, misguided, muddled, searing, exhilarating, dull, and fascinating.
What Scorsese is trying to do is place characters conceived in 70's realism into an early 1950's musical world of big sets on soundstages.
"New York, New York" - You have heard the song dozens of times, probably, but this is the original version.
And then there is Liza Minnelli. This is a great performance that justifies all the acclaim she received after Cabaret. But there was so little call for a great musical film star in the 1970's. This was one of the few pictures that required her talents. The tragedy is that hardly anyone saw it, so the work did little to boost her reputation, which left Minnelli as a star without a portfolio.
"Happy Endings" - This was a comprehensive ten minute production number originally. It was modeled after the "Born in a Trunk" sequence in A Star is Born - a film within the film that Jimmy is watching years after their breakup. After the film opened, it was cut down to this abbreviated version.
You can't watch this without getting the sense that Scorsese is using Minnelli to conjure her mother, Judy Garland. This is Judy's era, and there are echo's of A Star is Born in the story. The wigs and costuming, especially towards the end when Francine is a movie star, at times seem to be presenting a Garland biopic.
What you have here is a huge deliberate clash of styles. I say deliberate because I think that is exactly what interests Martin Scorsese and why he bothered to make the movie. But its also the same thing that frustrates audiences. Liza Minnelli seems to be there to make a backstage musical love story, but she is saddled with a dark, cruel partner that nullifies all the song and romance. It's always interesting to see them struggle against each other, but it's not very satisfying.
If this was just a bold experiment, and then Martin Scorsese came back with another musical the next year having learned the lessons of NYNY, then it would have been worthwhile. But this was his only musical - he never returned to the form. It's as if Bob Fosse made Sweet Charity (another noble failure), and then nothing else.
There is a great Blu-Ray version available that was issued in 2011 for the film's 35th Anniversary. It includes the full "Happy Endings" sequence.
New York, New York
Great performances, great songs, and a strong directorial style should have made Martin Scorsese's 1977 film musical New York, New York a hit - or at least a critical success. It begins as a meet-cute post-war romantic comedy and then develops into a backstage musical with a familiar rags-to-riches / price-of-fame arc.
But for all it's abundant talent and craft the film sinks with a protagonist so abusive, insecure, and selfish that audiences preferred to flee the theater than spend two and a half hours in the presence of jazz sax player Jimmy Doyle (Robert DiNiro). Think of his Travis Bickle character from Taxi Driver in a musical and you won't be far off track.
But with that rather big negative out of the way, the film has so much to offer. The film looks beautiful, and the sets are a Hollywood version of New York - similar to what you would see in MGM and Warner Brothers musicals of the time. It's ambitious, audacious, misguided, muddled, searing, exhilarating, dull, and fascinating.
What Scorsese is trying to do is place characters conceived in 70's realism into an early 1950's musical world of big sets on soundstages.
"New York, New York" - You have heard the song dozens of times, probably, but this is the original version.
And then there is Liza Minnelli. This is a great performance that justifies all the acclaim she received after Cabaret. But there was so little call for a great musical film star in the 1970's. This was one of the few pictures that required her talents. The tragedy is that hardly anyone saw it, so the work did little to boost her reputation, which left Minnelli as a star without a portfolio.
"Happy Endings" - This was a comprehensive ten minute production number originally. It was modeled after the "Born in a Trunk" sequence in A Star is Born - a film within the film that Jimmy is watching years after their breakup. After the film opened, it was cut down to this abbreviated version.
You can't watch this without getting the sense that Scorsese is using Minnelli to conjure her mother, Judy Garland. This is Judy's era, and there are echo's of A Star is Born in the story. The wigs and costuming, especially towards the end when Francine is a movie star, at times seem to be presenting a Garland biopic.
What you have here is a huge deliberate clash of styles. I say deliberate because I think that is exactly what interests Martin Scorsese and why he bothered to make the movie. But its also the same thing that frustrates audiences. Liza Minnelli seems to be there to make a backstage musical love story, but she is saddled with a dark, cruel partner that nullifies all the song and romance. It's always interesting to see them struggle against each other, but it's not very satisfying.
If this was just a bold experiment, and then Martin Scorsese came back with another musical the next year having learned the lessons of NYNY, then it would have been worthwhile. But this was his only musical - he never returned to the form. It's as if Bob Fosse made Sweet Charity (another noble failure), and then nothing else.
There is a great Blu-Ray version available that was issued in 2011 for the film's 35th Anniversary. It includes the full "Happy Endings" sequence.
Last edited: