Turkey had Ataturk. He was very much against Islam having any influence on government, describing it a chain around the leg of his country. He also had a wonderful sense of humour: when announced that "From today any Turkish woman may wear whatever she wants, only a prostitute must cover up with a hijab.", the hijab vanished over night.
Today many women in Turkey are back in their cages, as the hijab is returning. Islam is on the rise again. Erdogan has links to the Muslim brotherhood and he allows the supply lines for ISIS to run freely through his country. Did you know that Christians may not be in the army in Turkey or hold government posts? The gay related laws in Turkey are the same as they were under Ataturk, and no progress has been made since. It is entirely legal in Turkey to discriminate in employment on the grounds of sexual orientation, for example.It is also illegal in Turkey for a Christian to try to convert a Muslim, but not the other way round. Also, Roman Catholicism or any Christian protestant group are not even recognised as a religion in Turkey.
You can see the effects of Islam in any Muslim majority country, in a great many ways, in some places more than in others, but the influence in never benign.
Then you are confusing MUSLIMS with Islam. What Muslims make of Islam and to what extent they follow it is of course quite varied. What it teaches, though, in entirely clear.
Again, no. This would just prove that those interpretations exist.
"Kill the infidel wherever you find him", says the Qur'an. "Smite their necks". Not really a lot of room for interpretation.... It says what it says. In fact the Qur'an mentions "Jews" in a pejorative way more times than "Mein Kampf", despite of the fact that is is much shorter.
And your excuse that biblical texts have such passages to really does not help at all. For a start, the bible is seen as INSPIRED by God, i.e. as having human elements, and also simply accounts of events, which not examples to follow. To a Muslim the Qur'an is a guidance, an instruction given direct to him by Allah.
Somehow I see a lot less Christian terror attacks...and very few which actually cite Christianity as the reason for the attack. By contrast, there were 26974 terror attacks in the name of the "religion of peace" since 9/11 to date, an most killing other Muslims.
So we are not really comparing like with like.
About a third of the Qur'an is about people who do NOT follow Islam, how they are s
, how you may not be friends with them, how you are allowed to deceive and lie to them, how they only exist to serve Muslims, and how they all ultimately are destined for hell.
I don't think we have any other religion on the planet teaching such things. Also, every religion on the planet has, in one form or another, the "golden rule": Treat others as you want to be treated. Islam as the only one of the major religions does not.
Finally, a word about your favourite logical fallacy: "tu quoque". This is arguing that something is OK because other people do it too (whether that is correct or not.)
So, suppose you stand in front of a judge, just before sentencing, after having been found guilty of downloading some porn contrary to copyright, and you say "tio gilito does it too". Do you thing you get off for free?
How exactly does anything any other religion does or does not do make Islam morally more acceptable?
Another fact is that all religions have to be respected the same way within the boundaries of each countries constitution.
Why does a religion have to respected? All religions are not equal. Some may reserve some degree of respect others deserve contempt. A religion that teaches hatred to all outsiders and also to women and gays does not deserve any respect.
Laughably you mention "constitutions"... the more Islamic a country becomes the less religious freedom there is, the less democracy, ga right or freedom of speech.
So should we all, in the name of tolerance, bow down to those who tell us loud and clear they want to demolish our own freedoms?
If you ask me Muslims should be treated in exactly the same way as shariah demands they should treat non-Muslims.
And usually when people resort to shouting "you talk bullshit" it means they do not have a sensible reply. To some people a rational discussion is not important, it is all about shutting up the dissenter. Well, if you end up living in a Muslim majority country, then you find out what our current "politically correct" classes seem to have forgotten, but what our ancestors knew for centuries.
When Islam was young, it had a Syrian critic: the monk now known as St John of Damascus. He wrote a commentary on the Qur'an. The way the new Muslim rulers dealt with this troublesome monk was to cut off his hands, so stop him writing. No dialogue, first comes the sword. That is Islam. Islam always dealt with dissent that way. Why do you think that leaving Islam carries the death penalty in shariah? Islam cannot defend itself other than with violence.