Perhaps I might equally state that you should not repeat the substance of Al Jazeera press releases, since they have their particular slant and point of view. One does not need to subscribe to Neocon thinking (which I abhore) to do some research and discover some less-than-desirable friendships between various organizations.
I don't watch Al-Jazeera (it's pretty difficult to in the US...), and I won't make an assumption on where you get your news from. However, the pov that you expressed is very much so in line with neocon propaganda. They can only see the events in Egypt for how they may undermine US and Israeli policy; they have no sympathy and trust in the Egyptian people realizing what they want for themselves, but raise the ludicrous idea of a caricature of the muslim brotherhood taking over just because it suits them.
We've all seen by now how the elite politicos in the US like to define dictatorship not by degree of democracy, but whether they personally like the policies of the state. This is all inherently hostile to the creation of a democratic Egypt, and attempts to pre-emptively write it off as being "like Iran" (a regime not as bad as Saudi Arabia but one that works against US policies) or run by "nazi-sympathizers" implying that any change in Egyptian foreign policy as a result of democracy will be motivated by anti-semitism instead of compassion for the Palestinians or Egyptian sovereignty over it's own borders. But Egyptians aren't to that point yet; they (christians, muslims, labor unions, young people, students, atheists...) have united under the banner of getting Mubarak out.
Muslims in the middle east had nothing to do with world war ii, and muslims, like many other European minorities, were killed in the holocaust. So no, there is no connection, and the attempt to blacken every single muslim organization into radical nazi terrorists really doesn't hold up in this case.