I do not have any kind of belief, for or against, in regard to things I can not scientifically prove. So in order to answer the question at hand, it is impossible for me to answer simply by yes or no. Do I believe a god exists? No. Do I believe there is no god? No. I am a pragmatic agnostic borderline ignostic.
That's a pretty high standard. Physicists theorise about the existence of parallel universes, dimensions we cannot physically access... but these are things that they cannot definitively prove. Even Richard Dawkins basically believes in aliens on other planets. He has no absolute scientific proof. But he can wonder and ponder and have his beliefs. Theory is important in and of itself. Similarly, there are instances where prove is simply not on the cards, but we pursue knowledge in certain fields regardless... will we ever gain even a real understanding of the million ways in which the human brain operates? Don't we just hope that someday we will? But it's not inevitable by any means. Should we, according to your standard, 'not have any kind of belief' about any of these issues?
The truth is you examined the matter of God, and more or less drew a 50/50 blank. You sit on the fence I suppose. But, maybe hop off the fence once in a while. Examine both sides. Wander in both directions. That might not amount to belief, but it would amount to wonder and a brave curiosity what will not shy away from the biggest mysteries of all. Are there other dimensions? parallel universes? Is there an ultimate source of existence? IS there something beyond the physical? Beyond the material? One thing is for sure, if we give up even asking and pondering, then we definitely will never obtain answers.
Of course you personally can avoid/dismiss the big questions. That is perfectly legitimate. Many do. But some keep on asking the big questions. So are they foolish, or brave? Which is it?
Of course if you want ask these big questions academically, how much funding will you get? But that is another question. If they can spend millions sending men to the moon, which has no resources we can use, practically speaking, surely they fund some other 'crazy' ventures. But then again, the trip to the moon has value as propaganda, and the technologies involved had potential for military application. Apparently a question like: 'why is there something, instead of nothing?' has no application? I don't believe so, do you?
)! 
