What really turns you off in porn ?

[Spartacus_x]

And another thing: paging Menatplay specifically - PLEASE let your models take off their suits eventually. There are few things worse than having a scorching hot sex good in the scene whose body you never actually get to see.

 

[Shelter]

And another thing: paging Menatplay specifically - PLEASE let your models take off their suits eventually. There are few things worse than having a scorching hot sex good in the scene whose body you never actually get to see.

:agree::agree::agree::agree::agree: A thousand times

 

[stephenhaines]

And another thing: paging Menatplay specifically - PLEASE let your models take off their suits eventually. There are few things worse than having a scorching hot sex good in the scene whose body you never actually get to see.

This is certainly a pet peeve of mine too. Most often at found at Men At Play, but others come under the same complaint when they take on a similar sex-at-the-office genre.

It's one thing if the models keep a few garments on for the oral, but when it's time to fuck, the clothes should be off.

Time and again you'll notice a MAP office sex scene where the top man is constantly distracted having to keep shirttails, pant flaps and swinging ties out of the way of what the camera is there to capture. In turn, his obvious annoyance is discomfiting to the viewer as well.

It's a great idea, I don't want sex at the office to disappear, but this detail is overdue being addressed.

 

[Shelter]

This is certainly a pet peeve of mine too. Most often at found at Men At Play, but others come under the same complaint when they take on a similar sex-at-the-office genre.

It's one thing if the models keep a few garments on for the oral, but when it's time to fuck, the clothes should be off.

Time and again you'll notice a MAP office sex scene where the top man is constantly distracted having to keep shirttails, pant flaps and swinging ties out of the way of what the camera is there to capture. In turn, his obvious annoyance is discomfiting to the viewer as well.

It's a great idea, I don't want sex at the office to disappear, but this detail is overdue being addressed.

I totally agree and I hope those persons responsible will read this here. When I watch a porn I don't want a Hollywood Blockbuster - but totally naked models. I want to see everything - that's the reason I watch porn. The perfectly-fitting suit, the nice tie to match the shirt - for me it is annoying and totally unimportant.

 

[stephenhaines]

And does anybody else roll their eyes the way the condoms magically appear in place, after a cutaway to a facial closeup or even some inanimate object in the room?

I also don't like when a wipe is used to quickly go from the oral to anal that's obviously been in progress a while before it's edited in, denying us a genuine, initial penetration shot and good quality yelp out of the bottom guy.

Since porn is one area of entertainment that always showcases something we've all done, it will also always be judged in comparison to our own experiences, to the better or to the less.

 

[Shelter]

What me turns off at once is a totally shaved model and if the camera shows in close up the cock of such a model and you can see all the hair stubbles (not really clean shaved) and worst the little red pimples - horrible and a totally turn off for me.

 

[Steven_Todd]

And does anybody else roll their eyes the way the condoms magically appear in place, after a cutaway to a facial closeup or even some inanimate object in the room?

I also don't like when a wipe is used to quickly go from the oral to anal that's obviously been in progress a while before it's edited in, denying us a genuine, initial penetration shot and good quality yelp out of the bottom guy.

Since porn is one area of entertainment that always showcases something we've all done, it will also always be judged in comparison to our own experiences, to the better or to the less.

I totally agree. If the guy to going to put on a condom then why not show the guy putting it on or better yet show his partner putting it on. Also to not show the initial penetration shot is very disappointing as well as the initial reaction of the bottom.

 

[jaykaytooooo]

I hate the cutaway prior to shot.

Ex.: bottom s, top pulls out, jacks off, appears very ready to , but doesnt, then a cut away then he finally s obviously much later.

I like the top to pull out and right away without having to cut away! Shows how turned on they are. Thats why i love straight performers cause they usually dont have issue coming right away, such as Brick Danger, Tyler Nixon, Van Wylde, Danny Mountain, Johnny Sins, etc.

 

[xenos]

It's not a turnoff, just an irritation.

I hate having to close a bunch of unwanted ads just because I clicked the play button on a video, or changed the volume on the vid, or clicked a neutral area so I could scroll down the page a bit. I especially hate having to wade thru a bunch of straight pussy porn when I am trying to view a gay vid. Today I clicked on one GH post. Instead of a larger version of the pic, I got tons of advertising and invitations to download several questionable programs. I finally had to completely close my browser to finally get get out of that mess.

 

[stephenhaines]

Not so much a turn off as a disappointment, but it irks me that for the all the years he's been at it Tim Kruger has never bottomed, and that Girth Brooks got away without ever giving us a sample either.

'Bottoming holdouts' get on my nerves. If pioneers of gay porn like Jack Wrangler and Al Parker weren't too good to give it up, nobody in gay porn today has a backside too precious.

Brooks, Kruger

 

[Shelter]

A short time ago I've seen a porn movie which really was horrible. During the top was fucking the bottom he was chewing gum and that with a so bored face as if he was polish shoes. How can a director of such a movie allow that? It was really to turn off and I think as well it was an insult to the viewer.

 

[Hyp]

Not so much a turn off as a disappointment, but it irks me that for the all the years he's been at it Tim Kruger has never bottomed, and that Girth Brooks got away without ever giving us a sample either.

Girth Brooks is decidedly gay-for-pay. He doesn't suck, and I only recall him kissing another guy once, very briefly. (Allesio Romero) I think he's allowed guys to rim him, but otherwise he does scenes mainly to act as a live-action dildo.

Here's a picture of him and that brief kiss...

 

[jaykaytooooo]

My favorite tops bottoming! And i HATE the pressure from people that make them do something they do not want to do! Sorry, i know some of you will be mad at me for saying that, but my tops becoming bottoms....well, i will not even watch the clip UNLESS its another of my favorite tops topping the top-to-bottom guy (example, Paddy obrien being forced to bottom cause of the pressure...so annoying!!).

ANOTHER TURN OFF:
EXTREME close ups of the intercourse that you do not even see the faces of the performers, AND combined with that a set that adds to the mystery. Example: Eric Videos. I love some of the Eric Videos when it has Antonio Biaggi or Peto Coast, but i know it is them, but other EV's all the guys look exactly alike.

 

[stephenhaines]

My favorite tops bottoming! And i HATE the pressure from people that make them do something they do not want to do! Sorry, i know some of you will be mad at me for saying that, but my tops becoming bottoms....well, i will not even watch the clip UNLESS its another of my favorite tops topping the top-to-bottom guy (example, Paddy obrien being forced to bottom cause of the pressure...so annoying!!).

ANOTHER TURN OFF:
EXTREME close ups of the intercourse that you do not even see the faces of the performers, AND combined with that a set that adds to the mystery. Example: Eric Videos. I love some of the Eric Videos when it has Antonio Biaggi or Peto Coast, but i know it is them, but other EV's all the guys look exactly alike.

I'm not mad at you, jaykaytooooo, but I try to remember that when it comes to gay porn stars, even when they do enjoy what they're doing in front of cameras, they're not there to enjoy themselves, they're there to entertain us, and make the money they're paid worth it. They are there to lend flesh and blood to sex fantasies often of the type few of us will be lucky enough to live.

Any of them, Brooks and Kruger included, can adamantly refuse to bottom, and that's that. But my respect will always go the most to guys like Landon Conrad and Trenton Ducati (to name two), who jumped in the deep end (so to speak) from the very beginning, doing it all and trying to please the widest swath of fans possible. Even Colby Jansen, my very favorite, delayed bottoming over a year, but he too finally did so in what I like to think was mandated by his pride as an entertainer. While I don't know if Jansen enjoyed it or not, there's now four or five samples of him doing it very well, leaving a fan like with me with work to treasure long after whenever he retires.

For that, and all his work, I'm his respectful fan for a lifetime.

As for 3rIc videos, what's left me not very impressed with them is their substandard and frequently crappy lighting.

 

[Spartacus_x]

My favorite tops bottoming! And i HATE the pressure from people that make them do something they do not want to do! Sorry, i know some of you will be mad at me for saying that, but my tops becoming bottoms....well, i will not even watch the clip UNLESS its another of my favorite tops topping the top-to-bottom guy (example, Paddy obrien being forced to bottom cause of the pressure...so annoying!!).

100% agree with that - I loathe it. It's fine if they are versatile from the beginning, but if they switch to being a bottom after 13872 scenes, no, that's decidedly not my cup of tea and I won't be tuning in. I don't find entertainment in something one is cleary not comfortable with is and is only doing it out of pressure.
Those guys who stick to their principles despite the opportunity of being paid more actually get my respect.

 

[jaykaytooooo]

I'm not mad at you, jaykaytooooo, but I try to remember that when it comes to gay porn stars, even when they do enjoy what they're doing in front of cameras, they're not there to enjoy themselves, they're there to entertain us, and make the money they're paid worth it. They are there to lend flesh and blood to sex fantasies often of the type few of us will be lucky enough to live.

In a non-combative way I disagree. And, for this reason I will use "art" and music as example: porn is film "art" for adults just as is music and musical style is for musicians or singers. If a Musician, singer, writer, etc., isnt feeling comfortable writing or performing or singing say Rap, when thats not their genre, then they do not need to do rap, nor should they feel like they HAVe to.

Likewise fan bases shouldnt 100% dictate what artists do, though to a degree i do think artists owe a certain degree of "debt" (if you will), but, that doesnt necessarilty mean the "artist" (lol....in this case pornstar) must go against their principles and standards they have for themselves.

Any of them, Brooks and Kruger included, can adamantly refuse to bottom, and that's that. But my respect will always go the most to guys like Landon Conrad and Trenton Ducati (to name two), who jumped in the deep end (so to speak) from the very beginning, doing it all and trying to please the widest swath of fans possible.

I am a fan of Conrad and Ducati, BUT i refuse to watch their bottom scenes unless their scene includes one of my other fave tops.

As for 3rIc videos, what's left me not very impressed with them is their substandard and frequently crappy lighting.

EV lighting is HORRIBLE!!! You are so right!!

 

[jaykaytooooo]

100% agree with that - I loathe it. It's fine if they are versatile from the beginning, but if they switch to being a bottom after 13872 scenes, no, that's decidedly not my cup of tea and I won't be tuning in. I don't find entertainment in something one is cleary not comfortable with is and is only doing it out of pressure.
Those guys who stick to their principles despite the opportunity of being paid more actually get my respect.

For me, i am more acceptable of my tops bottoming occasionally if they started out as bottoms or more versatile (like Kayden Gray, Jake Bass, Pierre Fitch, (etc )

However, if i was attracted to my top CAUSE they were, are and STAYED tops, like Tyler Torro, Trystan Bull, Paddy O, Jack King, Gabriel Clark, Cameron Sage (straight Seth Dickens), etc., then for them to bottom ONLY cause they were pressured to do so, thats disappointing.

 

[Hyp]

However, if i was attracted to my top CAUSE they were, are and STAYED tops, like Tyler Torro, Trystan Bull, Paddy O, Jack King, Gabriel Clark, Cameron Sage (straight Seth Dickens), etc., then for them to bottom ONLY cause they were pressured to do so, thats disappointing.

Gabriel Clark did an oral only scene where he serviced straight-guy Trystan Bull.

Gabriel isn't exactly a buttonhole virgin. He was topped on screen by Leo Domenico, Marko Lebeau and I think at least one other guy.

 

[xenos]

Nothing turns me off so fast as the use of force. I hate rape and kidnapping videos just as much as I detest such things in real life.:no::no::no::no::no:

 

[jaykaytooooo]

Gabriel Clark did an oral only scene where he serviced straight-guy Trystan Bull.

Gabriel isn't exactly a buttonhole virgin. He was topped on screen by Leo Domenico, Marko Lebeau and I think at least one other guy.

Oh yeah, i know Clark has bottomed, but it is rare, and he tops about 98% of the time.

In addition to what u wrote i know in a threesome with Adrian Long and Mason Star with Cockyboys he was in a train where he bottomed for adrian while topping for Mason but it is very rare.