What really turns you off in porn ?

[jjjack]

Boring toes

Sorry I have to repeat, but Earth to porners, Earth to porners:

STOP with the toe licking, toe sucking and "toegasms." which is really one of the lamest concepts ever. They named a whole studio after it! LOL Toes are more boring than camera men filming other camera men, and it's hard to imagine anything more boring than that.

I'd rather see an elbow fetish---or a kneecap fetish. While somewhat limited in sex appeal, both of those body parts have WAY more charisma than toes.

 

[jjjack]

Butt idea

Here's an idea for something different and better:

Get a guy with an amazing set of glutes. Just rippling in every direction. Maybe mid-twentyish. Then have a couple of studly, mildly muscly but horny as hell 18- to 20-year-old first-timers fawn over the older dude's butt cheeks. Together, they can kiss on them, mouth them, fondle and caress them, kiss each other once in a while too, rub their massive virgin cockheads on those rippling globes until they both shoot massive loads all over that hot muscle butt flesh.

Then the older dude gets on the floor, spreads his legs into the widest possible position and locks them in place by positioning his elbows and upper arms behind his knees, then he jacks off like a maniac and blows another massive, sky-high load while his younger buddies worship his amazing butt some more.

NO boring toe sucking, NO boring super close-ups of cock in butt, in fact NO buttfucking at all. It's their first time, right? How many of you buttfucked the first time you did anything with a guy? Mostly it was sucking and jacking off, wasn't it? I'd be surprised if there was even much kissing. But if you're not buying it, let's do a survey and find out.

Anyway, there's what I'd call a hot porn flick. It only needs to be 5 minutes long, not 20. Every shot should include footage of the dude's faces (that means facial expressions as he s) as well as one decent closeup of the shot (but not so close that it's blurry). So that means at least two cams have to be employed. One can be a webcam in a fixed spot if you have to save money.

DO IT SOON!

Oh yeah, one more thing: NO interaction between the camera man and the models AT ALL. Just do the scene. Two young dudes eyeing their older buddy's butt, one thing leads to another.

BUTT WORSHIP 101

It's not rocket science, so why hasn't this been done before? Duh!

After that scene is a success, do another (again, only 5 minutes) where both younger dudes stick their rock-hard cocks tween the older stud's biceps and flanks and then they both hump the stud's armpits at the same time till they both launch massive jets that fly halfway across the room.

Another thing: at least two of these studs are blond, if not all three.

O.K., I keep thinking of improvements, but here's the most important one: When filming the shots make sure you get footage of the faces, the actual shot, AND the taint spasming. This can easily be accomplished with two cams, even if one is a webcam.

Editing should be simple. NO yo-yo editing (interspersing close-ups every 5 or 10 seconds). Keep close-ups to a minimum---no more than 10% of the entire flick. I'd prefer no close-ups at all myself, but I know some porn addies adore them, but please use them sparingly and group them together. Inserting them every 5 secs (yo-yo editing) is really dull and too interruptive. Include only a few frames of each close-up for each new position, and that's it. Except there aren't that many positions in the above suggested scenes, so, except for the shots, axe the close-ups altogether if you want.

 

[SoleLove]

It's totally the other way around for me. Movies that don't feature any feet sole scenes appeal less to me. I (and many others) love it when feet soles are clearly shown, especially during anal legs-in-the-air scenes.

Great examples:
Anon URL

Anon URL

Anon URL

Anon URL

Anon URL

Anon URL

Anon URL

Anon URL

Now, if these examples don't suffice to make you understand what arouses us in feet, you won't ever understand.


Here are now simple feet soles shots (great pics):

This guy's feet soles are awesome!!! Anon URL

Anon URL

Anon URL

Once again, just awesome! Anon URL


As for toe and sole-sucking... It's a great added bonus! Once in awhile, why not?

Anon URL

Anon URL

Anon URL

 

[jjjack]

Toes suck

All hot examples. Thanks. Except for the toe sucking. I love shots of spread-eagle bottoms---and soles, curled toes, and all forms of foot distortion are definitely a part of that attraction. I like everything a male bod does in the throes of the Big O---all the muscular, facial, taint tensions and spasms. Too bad we so rarely get to see any of them.

Most shots are filmed with one cam fixated a couple inches away from the cockhead. So the most important part of a porn flick, the Big O, we rarely get to see very well. We get to see the shot, but not much else. I feel cheated every time a super hot model is wasted by showing nothing but his sperm and ignoring his beautiful faces and all the other parts of his gorgeous bod at work when he’s launching his . Most porn flicks zoom in on the shot followed immediately by THE END. There’s rarely even any post-shot cock display. I mean, the level of imagination applied by porn makers is about as low as it gets.

I have nothing against feet or soles or curled toes. It’s toe sucking and licking that limpifies my cock.

 

[SoleLove]

In case three of the links did not work earlier (https URLs did not work):

Anon URL

Anon URL

This guy's feet soles are awesome!!! Anon URL

 

[Shelter]

Here's an idea for something different and better:

Get a guy with an amazing set of glutes. Just rippling in every direction. Maybe mid-twentyish. Then have a gouple of studly, mildly muscly but horny as hell 18- to 20-year-old first-timers fawn over the older dude's butt cheeks. Together, they can kiss on them, mouth them, fondle and caress them, kiss each other once in a while too, rub their massive virgin cockheads on those rippling globes until they both shoot massive loads all over that hot muscle butt flesh.

Then the older dude gets on the floor, spreads his legs into the widest possible position and locks them in place by positioning his elbows and upper arms behind his knees, then he jacks off like a maniac and blows another massive, sky-high load while his younger buddies worship his amazing butt some more.

NO boring toe sucking, NO boring super close-ups of cock in butt, in fact NO buttfucking at all. It's their first time, right? How many of you buttfucked the first time you did anything with a guy? Mostly it was sucking and jacking off, wasn't it? I'd be surprised if there was even much kissing. But if you're not buying it, let's do a survey and find out.

Anyway, there's what I'd call a hot porn flick. It only needs to be 5 minutes long, not 20. Every shot should include footage of the dude's faces (that means facial expressions as he s) as well as one decent closeup of the shot (but not so close that it's blurry). So that means at least two cams have to be employed. One can be a webcam in a fixed spot if you have to save money.

DO IT SOON!

Oh yeah, one more thing: NO interaction between the camera man and the models AT ALL. Just do the scene. Two young dudes eyeing their older buddy's butt, one thing leads to another.

BUTT WORSHIP 101

It's not rocket science, so why hasn't this been done before? Duh!

After that scene is a success, do another (again, only 5 minutes) where both younger dudes stick their rock-hard cocks tween the older stud's biceps and flanks and then they both hump the stud's armpits at the same time till they both launch massive jets that fly halfway across the room.

Another thing: at least two of these studs are blond, if not all three.

O.K., I keep thinking of improvements, but here's the most important one: When filming the shots make sure you get footage of the faces, the actual shot, AND the taint spasming. This can easily be accomplished with two cams, even if one is a webcam.

Editing should be simple. NO yo-yo editing (interspersing close-ups every 5 or 10 seconds). Keep close-ups to a minimum---no more than 10% of the entire flick. I'd prefer no close-ups at all myself, but I know some porn addies adore them, but please use them sparingly and group them together. Inserting them every 5 secs (yo-yo editing) is really dull and too interruptive. Include only a few frames of each close-up for each new position, and that's it. Except there aren't that many positions in the above suggested scenes, so, except for the shots, axe the close-ups altogether if you want.

JJJAK alone your script makes me hot and stiff!!! You should make such a porn flick as an director because you really have THE ideas from a good porn movie. I hope you will have the possibility! ppp

 

[brmstn69]

Two of my biggest turn-offs combined into one sex toy...

 

[jjjack]

two of my biggest turn-offs combined into one sex toy...

LOLOLOL!

Give it to Goodwill. St. Vincent de Paul. Stick it in the garbage disposal and turn it on liquify. Anything! Just get it out of my site before I laugh myself to death.

Actually, as an objet d'art, it does show a bit of photoshopping mastery. Maybe you deserve the Nobel Prize for pornographic art. You could probably sell it for trillions at Sotheby's. Can't hurt to try. Ha ha

 

[brmstn69]

LOLOLOL!

Give it to Goodwill. St. Vincent de Paul. Stick it in the garbage disposal and turn it on liquify. Anything! Just get it out of my site before I laugh myself to death.

Actually, as an objet d'art, it does show a bit of photoshopping mastery. Maybe you deserve the Nobel Prize for pornographic art. You could probably sell it for trillions at Sotheby's. Can't hurt to try. Ha ha

Too bad it's not photoshop, it's for real. It's called "The Vajankle"...

 

[Wohltorf]

Trimming bush is one thing, but turning it into a square little garden with a fountain in the middle is creepy. Some people have too much time on their hands in front of a mirror.

 

[Shelter]

Trimming bush is one thing, but turning it into a square little garden with a fountain in the middle is creepy. Some people have too much time on their hands in front of a mirror.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:agree::agree::agree::agree:

 

[SuaveB]

1. Stretched out holes
2. Porn stars that just don't know when to quit. Can't stand seeing the same dudes get banged 10 yrs later..
3. fisting is absolutely disgusting
4. skinny tops with big muscle bound bottoms..
5. all that bondage and s & m stuff. Being beat up if far from sexy to me
6. bottoms with big dicks being being fucked by tops with lil dicks
7. tops who never bottom. I need to see it at least once or I will get bored with them fast.
8. those damn jock strap things I HATE EM. And they seem to be popping up more and more ugh
9. feminine guys, especially topping. NO
10. no kissing
11. lack luster sex
12. hairy men
13. the whole "gay for pay" thing will never get me to believe it NOPE

 

[jaykaytooooo]

When the porn stars look so much a like you cannot tell them apart (Bel Ami and Staxus and a lot european studios).

 

[tonib]

Guys that don't kiss. For some reason, those are just no enjoyable porn to me.

 

[Spartacus_x]

1. Stretched out holes
2. Porn stars that just don't know when to quit. Can't stand seeing the same dudes get banged 10 yrs later..
3. fisting is absolutely disgusting
4. skinny tops with big muscle bound bottoms..
5. all that bondage and s & m stuff. Being beat up if far from sexy to me
6. bottoms with big dicks being being fucked by tops with lil dicks

Amen to all these! Really can't stand it.

 

[xenos]

Interviews

Lately I find there are many videos of interviews between porn stars interspersed with short sections of the two stars having sex. The videos keep cutting back and forth between the talk and the action. I find this frustrating. Just I am getting into the sex action, the video cuts to another section of the interview.

 

[stephenhaines]

With an exception here and there, I'm not much one for solo scenes. It seems to me one could get the same effect relieving yourself in front of a mirror.

With again an exception here and there, neither am I much inclined to threesomes or mob scenes. The more men there are in the scene, the more the camera (and editing) are strained trying to be fair to all, and the more diminished the likelihood you'll sense you got a satisfactory sample of any given favorite. Then too, the camera will be constantly moving away from the action that is turning you on to give equal time to crap you don't care about. It doesn't take long to get annoying.

Since the mechanics themselves - part A going in and out of part B - are always going to look the same, the variables a producer has to work with are the performers he can match up and their looks (which those performers tend to try to reinvent routinely), and whatever exotic, bizarre or stupid scenarios a writer can come up with that some director is able to stage.

Nevertheless, despite these efforts, gifted or abysmal, I don't think porn has yet managed to surpass the old-fashioned one-on-one scene where the two performers manage to create some believable chemistry. The fact that that's the way most of us actually have sex is more than just coincidental.

 

[junk4sts]

My Turn of list

I kind of dislike "gear porn" you know when the models wear sporting gear like football pads through and entire scene - That's really a boner kill.

I also dislike it when the bottom hides his dick with his hand or the camera man makes every effort not to show the bottoms dick - I don't care if the bottom's dick is hard or soft, big or small, but I want to see it. (soft and semi-hard dicks bouncing around is really hot to me )

Steroid look alike models, it's just boring. a good example is Landon Conrad and Johnny V, they were in a scene together and they essentially look exactly alike.

Over done screaming and yelling, the natural sounds of love making are fine, but when the guys screaming and yelling "FUCK ME" as loud as they can, that's just stupid.

Underarm licking and nipple pinching.

Too much ink - especially on a really handsome guy - some examples, Mike Mann, Ricky Roman, (his new chest tattoo is absolutely terrible!) Diego Thompson, Jordan Levine, Marxel Rios, and one of the worst offenders is Parker London.

Over using models, examples Jarec Wentworth, Johnny Rapid, Conner Maguire, Landon Conrad. I don't mind models performing for many years, some models like Tommy Defendi, and Colby Keller are still fun to watch and both have been in the industry for many years, but I think models need to limit their monthly video exposure to stay interesting.

Models who never change their look. Austin Wilde is a big offender on this one, if you look at his beginning work and his work now he still looks exactly the same, he should change it up every once in a while, grow some hair do something different.

I really hate directors or camera men talking to the models while they are having sex - This is a HUGE turnoff, I don't mind some chit-chat before the scene or after the scene, but for gods sake, off camera people SHUT THE HELL UP during the sex. (when gay room first started they ruined almost all of their scenes at damn that's big in this way)

Glorified gay-for-pay porn, don't get me wrong, I don't care if the models are gay for pay or not, but I don't think like when the studios make a big deal out of it. Randy Blue has become a big offender on this one recently - so is gayhoopla and of course "Broke straight boys" (that site's premise is just too stupid but some of the regular models are kind of hot)

feminine guys and overly skinny guys (most of helix's models i guess LOL)

 

[Shelter]

I know that it is not correct from myself - but I hate condoms, can't help. It turns me down. I like most of all bareback films.

 

[Spartacus_x]

Over using models, examples Jarec Wentworth, Johnny Rapid, Conner Maguire, Landon Conrad. I don't mind models performing for many years, some models like Tommy Defendi, and Colby Keller are still fun to watch and both have been in the industry for many years, but I think models need to limit their monthly video exposure to stay interesting.

This. This. This!!! It's so annoying. I get they want to seize the moment and strike the iron while it's hot and whatnot, but some long-term planning wouldn't hurt. I don't know what's worse, those who keep hogging the screen for years and years and years (Topher di Maggio is another big offender on this, he had to do a bottoming scene as he's simply run out of asses to fuck) or those who crash and burn out quickly. I used to like Marcus Ruhl a lot and he seemed to be pretty active with his work, and then he switched to bottoming all the time and is now pretty much gone. Or Robert Axel, who's turned to TS porn, something that's decidedly NOT my cup of tea.

Glorified gay-for-pay porn, don't get me wrong, I don't care if the models are gay for pay or not, but I don't think like when the studios make a big deal out of it. Randy Blue has become a big offender on this one recently - so is gayhoopla and of course "Broke straight boys" (that site's premise is just too stupid but some of the regular models are kind of hot)

God, yes. Sometimes they'll even talk about fucking girls before they randomly start making out. It's not erotic or arousing, it's simply stupid.

feminine guys and overly skinny guys (most of helix's models i guess LOL)

Also this. Maaaaybe I can tune in if a guy like that is fucked by a real muscle beast. If both are like that, it's worse than lesbian porn for me.