• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access.

    By joining you will gain full access to thousands of Videos, Pictures & Much More.

    Membership is absolutely FREE and registration is FAST & SIMPLE so please, Register Today and join one of the friendliest communities on the net!



    You must be at least 18 years old to legally access this forum.
  • Hello Guest,

    Thanks for remaining an active member on GayHeaven. We hope you've enjoyed the forum so far.

    Our records indicate that you have not posted on our forums in several weeks. Why not dismiss this notice & make your next post today by doing one of the following:
    • General Discussion Area - Engage in a conversation with other members.
    • Gay Picture Collections - Share any pictures you may have collected from blogs and other sites. Don't know how to post? Click HERE to visit our easy 3-steps tutorial for picture posting.
    • Show Yourself Off - Brave enough to post your own pictures or videos? Let us see, enjoy & comment on that for you.
    • Gay Clips - Start sharing hot video clips you may have. Don't know how to get started? Click HERE to view our detailed tutorial for video posting.
    As you can see there are a bunch of options mentioned in here and much more available for you to start participating today! Before making your first post, please don't forget to read the Forum Rules.

    Active and contributing members will earn special ranks. Click HERE to view the full list of ranks & privileges given to active members & how you can easily obtain them.

    Please do not flood the forum with "Thank you" posts. Instead, please use the "thanks button"

    We Hope you enjoy the forum & thanks for your efforts!
    The GayHeaven Team.
  • Dear GayHeaven users,

    We are happy to announce that we have successfully upgraded our forum to a new more reliable and overall better platform called XenForo.
    Any feedback is welcome and we hope you get to enjoy this new platform for years and years to come and, as always, happy posting!

    GH Team

What really turns you off in porn ?

potedebranle69

New member
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Many things I don't like :
- Music, cause it's ALWAYS annoying to me and I like to hear the guys moan and breathe
- Generally straight forward sex scene, with nothing exiting before (yes I like some scenarios lol )
- I don't like when the bottom moans like a girl ... yerk!
- I hate when the top doesnt cum, or when the guys finish themselves wanking like they were alone (what's the point in having a beautiful guy next to you?)
- I dont like scat or fisting so I just do not dowload or watch these types of films
- I dont like when the guy(s) is/are not hard, or when you can tell that the bottom do not feel anything at all, and you could park a bus in here... It really turns me off, cause it's just not good sex, you can tell they do not enjoy this for one reason or another, so not exiting to watch
- I dont mind bi films. I like to watch a guy fucks a pussy. But honestly, I always think that woman are really bad at BJ!
- Generally I do not like twinks / young guy or feminine guy; so I do not watch these types of porns.

I think that's it. Well there's a lot of choice nowadays so we can be picky! But I have when I download a porn and realize it's a "bad" one for me!
 

turkeyboy

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
205
Reaction score
48
Points
28
The huge file sizes that we need to download.
For free users, the file hosters are so slow aswell.

Many studios are either not posting new items anymore or are "re-hashing" their past previous clips, eg. WT, LES, BDP.
 
Last edited:

absalom

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
372
Reaction score
8
Points
0
So much that turns me off ...

I used to like B€l@mi but for me it has become stale. Not exciting, same old, same old. It's like the magician's trick: once you know how it's done, you loose interest.

I hate it when performers wear clothes, especially socks.

When the bottom can't take a big dick and uses his hands to keep the top from fucking him properly.

When a scene lacks intensity and models are lacklustre.

Tattoos (of course)

When a studio constantly emphasizes that a model is 'straight' (William H1ggins).

Fashion victims.

When a scene doesn't have good penetration shots.

When the moaning goes on and on and on and on. I like talkers, much more exciting than moaners. But: a performer who can only say 'Fuck, yeah' is boring pretty soon.

When there is a big age gap between the performers, total turn off.


There's not much gay porn I really enjoy these days!
 

Shelter

Super Vip
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
6,750
Reaction score
4,699
Points
116
So much that turns me off ...

I used to like B€l@mi but for me it has become stale. Not exciting, same old, same old. It's like the magician's trick: once you know how it's done, you loose interest.

I hate it when performers wear clothes, especially socks.

When the bottom can't take a big dick and uses his hands to keep the top from fucking him properly.

When a scene lacks intensity and models are lacklustre.

Tattoos (of course)

When a studio constantly emphasizes that a model is 'straight' (William H1ggins).

Fashion victims.

When a scene doesn't have good penetration shots.

When the moaning goes on and on and on and on. I like talkers, much more exciting than moaners. But: a performer who can only say 'Fuck, yeah' is boring pretty soon.

When there is a big age gap between the performers, total turn off.


There's not much gay porn I really enjoy these days!

All what you have written here I will subscribe for more than 100%. :agree::agree::agree::agree:

All these complaints, or better the most of them, I've written to all of the well known Porn Studios and asked for a changing - but I've got only totally empty phrases or no answers.
 

dargelos

Super Vip
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,860
Reaction score
337
Points
83
This is a trivial little point but it bugs me;
Imagine a scene set in ancient Rome, two soldiers strip off their uniforms and what are they wearing underneath? Box fresh white Calvin Kleins of course. Excuse me, I don't think Ck were standard army issue two thousand years ago.
Or maybe we are in a prison cell, the cellmates rip off their orange overalls, guess what their underwear is? Yes, box fresh white Calvin Kleins. Despite what you read in the cheap newspapers about prison life being too soft, they do not hand out free Ck duds in any jailhouse.
Perhaps the film is about some homeless boys who live in a squat. When the action starts they tear away their stained t shirts and ripped jeans in order to reveal, suprise suprise, our favourite box fresh white Calvin Kleins. I can assure you from personal experience that when you are homeless the last thing you can afford to waste money on is overpriced designer underwear.
 

trypt

New member
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
348
Reaction score
4
Points
0
2 ordinary looking or ugly people big turnoff.
People with covered faces huge turn off. I like watching the face of top and bottom.
 

Shelter

Super Vip
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
6,750
Reaction score
4,699
Points
116
This is a trivial little point but it bugs me;
Imagine a scene set in ancient Rome, two soldiers strip off their uniforms and what are they wearing underneath? Box fresh white Calvin Kleins of course. Excuse me, I don't think Ck were standard army issue two thousand years ago.
Or maybe we are in a prison cell, the cellmates rip off their orange overalls, guess what their underwear is? Yes, box fresh white Calvin Kleins. Despite what you read in the cheap newspapers about prison life being too soft, they do not hand out free Ck duds in any jailhouse.
Perhaps the film is about some homeless boys who live in a squat. When the action starts they tear away their stained t shirts and ripped jeans in order to reveal, suprise suprise, our favourite box fresh white Calvin Kleins. I can assure you from personal experience that when you are homeless the last thing you can afford to waste money on is overpriced designer underwear.

The very best post I've read in this thread. And despite all the vexation sooooo much humour! :thumbs up::thumbs up::thumbs up:
 

gregsanison

New member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
195
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Daddy Mugs turns me off. Any young man with that fat ugly bastard either needs (1)a medal for porn services or (2)a general anesthetic,

Yuck: :/
 

dargelos

Super Vip
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,860
Reaction score
337
Points
83
Mugs does have a lot of fans for some strange reason. As chubs go he is better than most, you should see the real ugly ones. No, maybe you shouldn't.
 

prickles

New member
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
181
Reaction score
1
Points
0
At the moment the 'Scripts'

1) Both actors already naked.
2) Kissing?(A tiny bit. Because they're straight and don't actually want to)
3)Mutual blowjobs.(as short as can be gotten away with).
4) Rimming. (Too much for the ones not into it and not done well enough for the ones who are.)
5) Fucking: First position (possibly with magically appearing condom and no visible prep being done.)
6)Fucking: Second position
7)Fucking: A position that lets the camera see a dick going in and out of ass. To prove it's hardcore/bareback/etc. (Could be stock footage it's so close.)
8)Cumming, with lots of wanking because no one is actually close to orgasm. (including me, the watcher)
9) The money shot. A tiny dribble is milked from the top's dick and drops on the bottom's back or something.

10) I go look at photos so I can play out my own fantasy, or dig through my old movies.

I find BA to be the worst offender of this, but not the only one. I suspect, straight actors have become straight directors and don't actually realise people want to see something a little different. Not every scene needs every part of the script. Do specific scenes concentrating on, rimming, mutual masturbation, blow job, that sort of thing. Hell, doing a striptease is hot and rare in porn.
 

Shelter

Super Vip
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
6,750
Reaction score
4,699
Points
116
At the moment the 'Scripts'


8)Cumming, with lots of wanking because no one is actually close to orgasm. (including me, the watcher)
9) The money shot. A tiny dribble is milked from the top's dick and drops on the bottom's back or something.

10) I go look at photos so I can play out my own fantasy, or dig through my old movies.

:agree::agree::agree::agree::agree:
So very often I've complained this. There you are watching more than 30 minutes the different fucking settings and finally you will watch the result and...........only two or three drops. For me always a big - no a VERY BIG disappointment (because I'm a real jizz fan). Sometimes, to be honest, I'll find an actor who really is a good shooter and that will be a scene I could watch ever and ever again - but it is very, very rare. ~X(
 

gregsanison

New member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
195
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Men who are described as 'daddies' but they are only about 5 years older than the twinks they fuck. Absurd!
 

jjjack

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
586
Reaction score
6
Points
0
STFU

In today’s ep of shit-fer-porn, a 20-sumthin blond adonis ascends a tenement’s skuzzy stairwell to greet his buddy’s 40-sumthin dad, uncle or whatev. You know the euphemisms. An avalanche of French greets the obligatory pecks per cheek, and the cam man is nonstop lip flap thereafter. That’s right, it’s chatterporn—which means insanely boring—that is, unless yer wad’s already blown and the principals actually have something interesting to say in a language you can understand. Understanding nothing but shit-fer-Anglo makes us boring too, though. So celebrate the hypocrisy, not just diversity.

Anyway, between all the pseudo-cinéma vérité and giggling, the usual positions are attempted then frustratingly (and customarily) aborted mere nanosecs before intense expectations of everyone’s Big O. Finally, after massive wastes of everyone’s time, they get around to it in a position I happen to love—adjacent on the grungy couch, legs spread eagle with the two closest intertwined—and what does chatty kathy the cam man do? He misses the fukkeen first money shot. WTF? After all that time squandering? Oh well, no biggie. Who cares about grandpa anyway?

Finally, something good happens when 7 healthy squirts of adonis blond’s adonis cream blow, leaving behind a lustering lake on his half-assed abs. We even catch a very brief glimpse of his goofy cum face and taint spasticity before the cam zooms in. Hey, the glimpse is longer in slo-mo!

Even though we already knew these lame-oids weren’t gonna purchase two cams for a better-filmed c-shot, this basic fool’s errand isn't totally worthless (the ejaculating blond would make a nice .gif). But this mostly trashy shit-fer-porn has to remain nameless, so if you do encounter it, you’ll just have to suffer through the fabulous spectacle of your “time’s dear waste.” Maybe you’ll run into the .gif somewhere.

I share this landfill only because venting is cathartic.


 

jjjack

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
586
Reaction score
6
Points
0
At the moment the 'Scripts'

1) Both actors already naked.
2) Kissing?(A tiny bit. Because they're straight and don't actually want to)
3)Mutual blowjobs.(as short as can be gotten away with).
4) Rimming. (Too much for the ones not into it and not done well enough for the ones who are.)
5) Fucking: First position (possibly with magically appearing condom and no visible prep being done.)
6)Fucking: Second position
7)Fucking: A position that lets the camera see a dick going in and out of ass. To prove it's hardcore/bareback/etc. (Could be stock footage it's so close.)
8)Cumming, with lots of wanking because no one is actually close to orgasm. (including me, the watcher)
9) The money shot. A tiny dribble is milked from the top's dick and drops on the bottom's back or something.

10) I go look at photos so I can play out my own fantasy, or dig through my old movies.

I find BA to be the worst offender of this, but not the only one. I suspect, straight actors have become straight directors and don't actually realise people want to see something a little different. Not every scene needs every part of the script. Do specific scenes concentrating on, rimming, mutual masturbation, blow job, that sort of thing. Hell, doing a striptease is hot and rare in porn.

Agree totally!

Where's the display? Where's the imagination?

Amateurs on the tube sites do a lot better job of making our cocks flickable and our cum edgeable.

Hiring cam men and even editors has become a colossal waste of time. They film money shots so close everything blurs. Only RARELY do we ever get to see the stars actually cumming, no matter how beautiful they are. You can go through a lot of porn frame by frame and still never, or almost never, see a face---so you can't even tell who the fukk the stars are! Cam men and editors seem to think we want to be close enough to diagnose the models' folliculitis all the time. PULL THE DAMN CAM BACK!

The studios that film money shots from 3 different angles actually have a clue what they're doing.

Why not try a little frot for a change? All these super beefy quads and hams but no one sticking their hardly-ons between them till they stiffen up and squirt like maniacs.

Why not two 18yos rubbing hards on P@ddy 0'Br1@n's standing cheeks till they're bathed in neophytic jizz?

I'm a massive spunk junkie too. How bout scooping it up for use as lube in the next jackoff? You never see that. Or almost never anyway.

There are lots of fresh fantasies out there for amateurs to film and fulfill. The "pros" obviously can't do it. Or they won't.
 
Last edited:

jjjack

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
586
Reaction score
6
Points
0
Many things I don't like :
- Music, cause it's ALWAYS annoying to me and I like to hear the guys moan and breathe
- Generally straight forward sex scene, with nothing exiting before (yes I like some scenarios lol )
- I don't like when the bottom moans like a girl ... yerk!
- I hate when the top doesnt cum, or when the guys finish themselves wanking like they were alone (what's the point in having a beautiful guy next to you?)
- I dont like scat or fisting so I just do not dowload or watch these types of films
- I dont like when the guy(s) is/are not hard, or when you can tell that the bottom do not feel anything at all, and you could park a bus in here... It really turns me off, cause it's just not good sex, you can tell they do not enjoy this for one reason or another, so not exiting to watch
- I dont mind bi films. I like to watch a guy fucks a pussy. But honestly, I always think that woman are really bad at BJ!
- Generally I do not like twinks / young guy or feminine guy; so I do not watch these types of porns.

I think that's it. Well there's a lot of choice nowadays so we can be picky! But I have when I download a porn and realize it's a "bad" one for me!

HATRED of porn muzak is very widespread, which probably led to its demise, for the most part. Some producers still use music, but they should STOP. Case in point: one porn flick advertised "dirty talk" to attract viewers, but the muzak was so LOUD it drowned out all the dirty talk (which wasn't very dirty anyway and not very talkative either). How flippin' brain dead is that? You might as well eat your peas with a shotgun!

Fake moaning gets old so fast. Constant moaning makes me hate the idiots who do it. The BA cam man who's always appearing in his own productions likes to say, "More noise! More noise!" All that does is highlight and intensify the fake factor, especially if a lot of their models are str8, as they love to claim they are. Sex is not just a search for pleasure but also a search for the genuine in a world full of phoney baloney. We don't need more fake anything. I like strong, silent types who try to suppress their noise but can't help making some at truly climactic moments. If a porny's been squealing like a branded she-ox from the get-go, what's he gonna do when the Big O arrives? Sing the Russian national anthem?

I also hate masculine-looking dudes who, when they finally do talk, sound like total femmes.
 

jjjack

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
586
Reaction score
6
Points
0
The huge file sizes that we need to download.
For free users, the file hosters are so slow aswell.

Many studios are either not posting new items anymore or are "re-hashing" their past previous clips, eg. WT, LES, BDP.

A lot of huge files are probably marketed to high-end consumers by uploaders trying to make money. They want us to purchase premium service from the file hosters because they'll get paid for that. But don't GH rules stipulate that uploads must be free to download? Yeah, I think they do. Even if there is a free option, it's so slow that the download becomes totally impossible.

Awesome-looking amateurs can easily make their own porn---usually a lot better porn than the pros---by purchasing 2 or 3 cheap webcams, placing them strategically, then editing the footage together themselves. About 60% to 75% of so-called "professional" porn these days involves watching two pelvises without legs or heads. Except for the squirt off, what's the justification for all these closeups? If all ya wanna see is body parts, maybe you need therapy.

Close-ups should be reduced to 10% and placed mostly in the same spot, NOT yo-yo edited intermittently every 10 seconds. The money shot closeup should be just one of several other Big O shots (requiring extra cams) that show facial expressions, full-body muscle flexing, and taint/ass spasms (if possible). My favorite angle for the Big O allows the viewer to see taint, cumshot and cumface simultaneously. That can be done plenty close enough to see everything well, including the squirts. A few studios know how to do this. Most have no clue. But screw the studios. Check out the amateur tube sites if you wanna see porn that will actually make you ejaculate.
 
Last edited:

jjjack

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
586
Reaction score
6
Points
0
All what you have written here I will subscribe for more than 100%. :agree::agree::agree::agree:

All these complaints, or better the most of them, I've written to all of the well known Porn Studios and asked for a changing - but I've got only totally empty phrases or no answers.

One critic on here said this about BA's current crop of models:

"They all look like Ken dolls."

LOL

Many of them aren't even good looking anymore. Many are downright ugly. When that studio first began most all of their models were super hot, I thought. Now it's down to one or two once in a while.
 

jjjack

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
586
Reaction score
6
Points
0
This is a trivial little point but it bugs me;
Imagine a scene set in ancient Rome, two soldiers strip off their uniforms and what are they wearing underneath? Box fresh white Calvin Kleins of course. Excuse me, I don't think Ck were standard army issue two thousand years ago.
Or maybe we are in a prison cell, the cellmates rip off their orange overalls, guess what their underwear is? Yes, box fresh white Calvin Kleins. Despite what you read in the cheap newspapers about prison life being too soft, they do not hand out free Ck duds in any jailhouse.
Perhaps the film is about some homeless boys who live in a squat. When the action starts they tear away their stained t shirts and ripped jeans in order to reveal, suprise suprise, our favourite box fresh white Calvin Kleins. I can assure you from personal experience that when you are homeless the last thing you can afford to waste money on is overpriced designer underwear.

LOL. Hey, they have to make money some way. They've been reduced to ridiculous forms of product placement.
 
Top