• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access.

    By joining you will gain full access to thousands of Videos, Pictures & Much More.

    Membership is absolutely FREE and registration is FAST & SIMPLE so please, Register Today and join one of the friendliest communities on the net!



    You must be at least 18 years old to legally access this forum.
  • Hello Guest,

    Thanks for remaining an active member on GayHeaven. We hope you've enjoyed the forum so far.

    Our records indicate that you have not posted on our forums in several weeks. Why not dismiss this notice & make your next post today by doing one of the following:
    • General Discussion Area - Engage in a conversation with other members.
    • Gay Picture Collections - Share any pictures you may have collected from blogs and other sites. Don't know how to post? Click HERE to visit our easy 3-steps tutorial for picture posting.
    • Show Yourself Off - Brave enough to post your own pictures or videos? Let us see, enjoy & comment on that for you.
    • Gay Clips - Start sharing hot video clips you may have. Don't know how to get started? Click HERE to view our detailed tutorial for video posting.
    As you can see there are a bunch of options mentioned in here and much more available for you to start participating today! Before making your first post, please don't forget to read the Forum Rules.

    Active and contributing members will earn special ranks. Click HERE to view the full list of ranks & privileges given to active members & how you can easily obtain them.

    Please do not flood the forum with "Thank you" posts. Instead, please use the "thanks button"

    We Hope you enjoy the forum & thanks for your efforts!
    The GayHeaven Team.
  • Dear GayHeaven users,

    We are happy to announce that we have successfully upgraded our forum to a new more reliable and overall better platform called XenForo.
    Any feedback is welcome and we hope you get to enjoy this new platform for years and years to come and, as always, happy posting!

    GH Team

What really turns you off in porn ?

luvmuslmen

Banned
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
548
Reaction score
35
Points
0
Music so loud I can't hear anything other than it

Amen to that. That has been a pet peeve of mine for a long time. I have gotten more into so-called "amateur" sites, lately, such as Sean Cody, Corbin Fisher, Randy Blue and Bound Gods (not amateur) because they don't use music, usually. I also agree with those who are turned off by no kissing, no passion, effeminate and too many or, for me, huge mf***ing tattoos. :thumbs up:

Guess I'm just very picky! lol
 

josh_the_hot_boy

1-800-DIAL-A-FUCK
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,097
Reaction score
107
Points
63
Anyone who isn't in front of the camera talking on the camera! If I can't see you on camera then I don't need to hear you so shut the fuck up. Guys that stay in one position to long cause then I get distracted and look for the fast forward button. When the guys seem to mechanical and not sort of going with the flow like their trying to remember what they memorized in their head 30 minutes ago.
 

Kev706

New member
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I hate the really professional looking porn where the actors just look like their at work and they're not into it at all.
 

iotbg

MEMBER 24997
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
4,772
Reaction score
653
Points
0
Anyone who isn't in front of the camera talking on the camera! If I can't see you on camera then I don't need to hear you so shut the fuck up. Guys that stay in one position to long cause then I get distracted and look for the fast forward button. When the guys seem to mechanical and not sort of going with the flow like their trying to remember what they memorized in their head 30 minutes ago.


:nail biting:lol
 

jjjack

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
586
Reaction score
6
Points
0
Too much

This is just about my favorite thread on GH. There is so much wrong with the way porn is filmed, it’s impossible to cover it all. It’s like WWII---no amount of volumes can thoroughly address the issue. But I just keep trying anyway.

Why is porn so packed with uggos? Don’t producers have a clue what “attractive” means? I know it’s diff for everyone---that is to say, subjective---but c’mon, some of these guys they cram into scenes couldn’t attract a warthog with leprosy. Then there are the poor Adonises forced to have sex with these trolls. I hope they’re paid more for all that extra pretending they have to do, but I sorta doubt that they are. A case in point is Billy Rubens---great face and bod, deep voice (definitely a bone-inducing feature), and at least a hint of charisma. But he is surrounded with uggos in literally every flick. The only way to watch his stuff is to delete every frame that contains anything other than his face, butt or torso. But who has the frickin’ time to do that? Or even learn how?

I’ve railed against close-ups on here many times, but even I can tolerate close-ups of those luckies who are gorgeous from head to toe, even though they’re a disturbing reminder of just how unfair the universe is. Unbelievably, grossly, and even catastrophically unfair! So unfair that one has to conclude that unfairness is the guiding principle on which the entire universe operates. Yeah, even I can tolerate a few close-ups of those guys---you know the ones I mean---the ones who are so good looking that even their assholes shine.

Regarding cam men who won’t shut the horizontal twats between their chin and nose, please stuff their mouths with cotton and tape their lips shut. Some even verbally intrude during the Big O. I mean, it sorta destroys any illusion that something “natural” is going on.

Still very little frottage to be found anywhere in porn. I guess every porn pro is too unimaginative to think of it. Duh! A few rubbing cocks here and there, but not enough. I finally found the cock-thrusting-between-flank-and-biceps scene I’ve been wanting to see for so long, but it only lasted for a couple of seconds, not all the way to the Big O, which really would’ve gotten me hard. I love tight sacs too, but no gay couple ever rubs theirs together. I wanna see massive cockheads rubbing the underside of tight sacs, or the longest cocks thrusting between beefy thighs and squirting out the other side.

There’s rarely any display, like two dudes watching each other slowly get hard, or standing with hips stuck out to make cocks look bigger and longer. Amateur web cam dudes often do a lot of display because they’re anxious to show how fantastically massive their pricks are! That’s hot. But you never see it in “professionally” made porn. It’s like they have no idea how sex is really done or how guys really get off.

Instead we get endless BJs, which usually consist of the same damn motion over and over until you can’t stand it anymore, and endless closeups (shots so close and so long you have time to test every square inch for skin cancer). I can’t see a damn thing during close-ups. It’s like I went blind. The beautiful faces---gone! The beautiful movements---gone! It’s like driving through southern Wyoming. You might as well stare at a rock for 3 hours.

Also, I won’t be happy until music is entirely eradicated from porn. Did they have organists play along with early porn flicks? I hope not. But if they didn’t, when and why did they start adding music? It makes no sense. I mean, they’re not dancing. And neither are we. Unless jerking off is some sort of dance. What if you can’t keep a beat?
 

Steven_Todd

New member
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
154
Reaction score
3
Points
0
I totally agree with everything you said jjjack. Especially the way porn is packed with uggos. Christ can't porn producers find good looking attractive men today. And it seems like almost every guy in porn today is covered in tattoos. I don't mine a tattoo here or there but some of these guys are covered from head to toe.

This is just about my favorite thread on GH. There is so much wrong with the way porn is filmed, it’s impossible to cover it all. It’s like WWII---no amount of volumes can thoroughly address the issue. But I just keep trying anyway.

Why is porn so packed with uggos? Don’t producers have a clue what “attractive” means? I know it’s diff for everyone---that is to say, subjective---but c’mon, some of these guys they cram into scenes couldn’t attract a warthog with leprosy. Then there are the poor Adonises forced to have sex with these trolls. I hope they’re paid more for all that extra pretending they have to do, but I sorta doubt that they are. A case in point is Billy Rubens---great face and bod, deep voice (definitely a bone-inducing feature), and at least a hint of charisma. But he is surrounded with uggos in literally every flick. The only way to watch his stuff is to delete every frame that contains anything other than his face, butt or torso. But who has the frickin’ time to do that? Or even learn how?

I’ve railed against close-ups on here many times, but even I can tolerate close-ups of those luckies who are gorgeous from head to toe, even though they’re a disturbing reminder of just how unfair the universe is. Unbelievably, grossly, and even catastrophically unfair! So unfair that one has to conclude that unfairness is the guiding principle on which the entire universe operates. Yeah, even I can tolerate a few close-ups of those guys---you know the ones I mean---the ones who are so good looking that even their assholes shine.

Regarding cam men who won’t shut the horizontal twats between their chin and nose, please stuff their mouths with cotton and tape their lips shut. Some even verbally intrude during the Big O. I mean, it sorta destroys any illusion that something “natural” is going on.

Still very little frottage to be found anywhere in porn. I guess every porn pro is too unimaginative to think of it. Duh! A few rubbing cocks here and there, but not enough. I finally found the cock-thrusting-between-flank-and-biceps scene I’ve been wanting to see for so long, but it only lasted for a couple of seconds, not all the way to the Big O, which really would’ve gotten me hard. I love tight sacs too, but no gay couple ever rubs theirs together. I wanna see massive cockheads rubbing the underside of tight sacs, or the longest cocks thrusting between beefy thighs and squirting out the other side.

There’s rarely any display, like two dudes watching each other slowly get hard, or standing with hips stuck out to make cocks look bigger and longer. Amateur web cam dudes often do a lot of display because they’re anxious to show how fantastically massive their pricks are! That’s hot. But you never see it in “professionally” made porn. It’s like they have no idea how sex is really done or how guys really get off.

Instead we get endless BJs, which usually consist of the same damn motion over and over until you can’t stand it anymore, and endless closeups (shots so close and so long you have time to test every square inch for skin cancer). I can’t see a damn thing during close-ups. It’s like I went blind. The beautiful faces---gone! The beautiful movements---gone! It’s like driving through southern Wyoming. You might as well stare at a rock for 3 hours.

Also, I won’t be happy until music is entirely eradicated from porn. Did they have organists play along with early porn flicks? I hope not. But if they didn’t, when and why did they start adding music? It makes no sense. I mean, they’re not dancing. And neither are we. Unless jerking off is some sort of dance. What if you can’t keep a beat?
 

jjjack

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
586
Reaction score
6
Points
0
"glory"

What about those rugged, ultra hot Aussie dudes who have to stand on one side of a phony glory hole and stick it through? The only way to see them get off is to watch a 900-year-old cadaver (an unbearable ogre from a Grade Z zombie flick perhaps?) suck them like some unspeakable squid with a beak that makes the Wicked Witch of the West look like Snow White. Make sure you’ve downed several anti-nausea pills before you venture into this territory or at least keep your barf bag handy. What a total waste of physical male talent! What the hell is the marketing “savvy” in this? It’s fun for the monstrosity, no doubt, but why film it? Why would anyone want to watch it? It’s beyond gross. Mondo beyondo gross. Double, triple, or even quadruple fisting would be more pleasant than this---and even single fisting I can’t stand. That’s so gross I have to delete the page ASAP to avoid my own innards turning inside out.
 

Spartacus_x

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2011
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Jjjack, I applaud you! That was fantastically well written. :D
I wonder about uggers in porn a lot too. I mean, not everyone needs to be an Adonis, although it would be preferable. :D But yes, those guys need to be at least reasonably good looking, especially if they're employed by those fancy famous studios. But very often they're... not. I don't get it. Is it supposed to somehow support the fantasy that everyone could get it on with those sexy, super-gorgeous hunks, even the people who barely look human? Well, that's not true and everyone should better get used to it.

Those endless blowjobs annoy me to no end. OK, a good BJ I could watch on and on. But NOT if it's a mechanical and repetitive action that looks more like a handjob than a blowjob in the first place. And don't get me started on bad rimming! I adore rimming. That's why I hate to see someone trying their hardest not to get their tongue anywhere near the asshole. Get out! If you're not gonna do that properly, don't do it at all.

And a pet peeve of mine - if the top has delicious, yummy, sexy butt, the director is of course not gonna get behind his back and show those fantastic buttocks working it.
But if he has an ugly butt (like Robert Van Damme, I love the dude, but his ass ain't all that anymore), voila! Shots from behind is basically all you get!
 

Spartacus_x

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2011
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I've mentioned it before, but I really hate it when scripted porn simply abandonds the plot out of blue and for no good reason. Like, you have the "office theme", two coworkers talking, nothing to suggest they're also fucking on the side, just a regular conversation - and then right in the middle of it they randomly start making out and feeling each other up. Why even bother?!

It's also lame when a guy with a drop dead gorgeous body never gets fully naked. Very common in Men at Play, unfortunately. And it's especially grating if his partner with a much worse body does lose all his clothes almost instantly!
 

trencherman

Junior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
2,035
Reaction score
17
Points
0
What about those rugged, ultra hot Aussie dudes who have to stand on one side of a phony glory hole and stick it through? The only way to see them get off is to watch a 900-year-old cadaver (an unbearable ogre from a Grade Z zombie flick perhaps?) suck them like some unspeakable squid with a beak that makes the Wicked Witch of the West look like Snow White. Make sure you’ve downed several anti-nausea pills before you venture into this territory or at least keep your barf bag handy. What a total waste of physical male talent! What the hell is the marketing “savvy” in this? It’s fun for the monstrosity, no doubt, but why film it? Why would anyone want to watch it? It’s beyond gross. Mondo beyondo gross. Double, triple, or even quadruple fisting would be more pleasant than this---and even single fisting I can’t stand. That’s so gross I have to delete the page ASAP to avoid my own innards turning inside out.

Maybe it’s a down under cultural thing, like beauties have to always appear with beasts. And the photographer’s skill at wielding the camera has not benefited from the almost ten years that the site has been around. Unlike Corbin Fisher, Sean Cody and Chaos Men where the recent clips have improved in clarity and style from those of say, three years ago.
 

jjjack

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
586
Reaction score
6
Points
0
hideosos

Jjjack, I applaud you! That was fantastically well written. :D
I wonder about uggers in porn a lot too. I mean, not everyone needs to be an Adonis, although it would be preferable. :D But yes, those guys need to be at least reasonably good looking, especially if they're employed by those fancy famous studios. But very often they're... not. I don't get it. Is it supposed to somehow support the fantasy that everyone could get it on with those sexy, super-gorgeous hunks, even the people who barely look human? Well, that's not true and everyone should better get used to it.

Thanks, Spar!

Maybe the glut of ogres is simple opportunism---their one and only chance to do it with a godsend---and get paid while exploiting the system! They must know the product won’t sell as well, but what do they care? The producers are probably rarely, if ever, around. Directors, editors and cam men get paid too whether the thing sells or not. Uggster does one of them a fave, walks outta makeup wit the same blinding hideousness he had when he walked in, then has the time of his life by climbing into a scene with someone who, without being well paid, would never look his way in a thousand years. Everybody’s happy. Except for the producer and the viewers---and the dreamboat. But who gives a flyin’ rat’s clit about them? Producer’s probably some str8 mafioso who doesn’t have a clue what turns us on and probably doesn’t care much either, as long as the books aren’t cooked down to a raunchy paste that yields no profit.

When the good lookers “retire” then return with tails between their legs (“please hire me again”), they’re usually paired with hideosos, I’ve noticed. Sometimes with a whole twilight zone of sagging, drooling sex tools from the Precambrian.

Personally, I’m not applying for a role in porn, but even so, lest anyone suspect otherwise (or that I might be identifying with the wrong group here), let me just humbly admit (with all due sincerity) that on a scale of 1 to a billion (where a billion = drop-dead gorgeous and 1 = dog meat dropped dead), I’m probably about a 2, give or take a few decimals.

Hey, maybe I actually do qualify for a starring role! Beam me up, scrotum!
 
Last edited:

absalom

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
372
Reaction score
8
Points
0
OK, time for a reality check ...!

If you think it is easy to find very handsome gay porn models who can perform in front of the camera you are mistaken. If you could find them on every street corner studios and porn agencies would have an easy time. Unfortunately this is not the case. Most of the time you get very average looking guys with normal sized dicks and this is the material a studio has to work with. Working in the gay porn industry closes many doors for you IRL and the payment is mediocre (people who think you get 1000s of $$$ per scene haven't got a clue about the current financial situation in the gay porn industry). So many guys who are very well suited to do gay porn (good looking and the ability to perform in front of the camera) shy away from doing gay porn because of the possible consequences.

Some people don't like close ups in gay porn but lets not forget that the studios that are most successful at this moment (CF, SC and BA) include them a lot in their scenes. There is a reason for this: a majority of gay guys like to see close ups (especially penetration shots). You may hate them but a lot of gay guys do not. Lesser studios see what is successful and copy this style of gay porn. It is the same mechanism as with television networks: if a television network has success with a show or series it will be copied by other television networks.

Ideally a gay porn director likes to work with 2 or more cameras. Because of financial restraints many studios can only afford one cameraman. If I'm not mistaken Eurocreme (the studio Billy Rubens works for) uses just 1 camera to shoot its scenes. This poses limits as to what you can film. It is of course possible to do subsequent takes of the same action but it almost always shows.

Music: I do not hear much music in the porn I watch these days. Some scenes start with music but this fades out when the action begins.
 
Last edited:

cdninweho

New member
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
103
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Not sure if these have been said before, but 2 things for me.

Magical condoms - action is moving alone and all of a sudden they are fucking with a condom. Is it so wrong to actually show them putting it on? We know they use them; in real life they don't magically appear, why do they in movies.

Stereotypical Interracial Scenes - white guy always the bottom, black guy always the top because he has the "bigger" cock. WTF - not reality in my experience.
 

Spartacus_x

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2011
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
Points
0
OK, time for a reality check ...!

If you think it is easy to find very handsome gay porn models who can perform in front of the camera you are mistaken. If you could find them on every street corner studios and porn agencies would have an easy time. Unfortunately this is not the case. Most of the time you get very average looking guys with normal sized dicks and this is the material a studio has to work with. Working in the gay porn industry closes many doors for you IRL and the payment is mediocre (people who think you get 1000s of $$$ per scene haven't got a clue about the current financial situation in the gay porn industry). So many guys who are very well suited to do gay porn (good looking and the ability to perform in front of the camera) shy away from doing gay porn because of the possible consequences.

Of course. I can easily see why it would be a problem especially for smaller studios who can't offer that much money.
But some bigger ones can and seem to constantly dish out an endless stream of Apollos in human form. That's why it's so strange they insist on some guys who decidedly are not attractive. If it's one on one sex, it maybe can be understandable that they didn't have another available option at the moment. But then they include them in threesomes and other -somes. I recently watched a scene featuring 5 guys. I'm not really into orgies but I watched it anyway. Four of them were at least passable, one was truly hideous. Guess who got the most screen time?!

Magical condoms - action is moving alone and all of a sudden they are fucking with a condom. Is it so wrong to actually show them putting it on? We know they use them; in real life they don't magically appear, why do they in movies.

I think this often happens because the guy has problems with sustaining his erection. It's common in formulaic "kiss-suck-fuck" porn. They are done with sucking and are moving on, but the top is only semi-hard at best. The next thing you see is that he has a condom on, is fully erect and they're fucking.

The other explanation is that a lot of guys find condoms to be a turn-off in porn (I don't), so maybe the producers think they'll appreciate it more if they don't actually get to see the condom being put on.
 

pi_kano3

New member
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
Points
3
What turns me off? Hairy bodies! I love smooth skinned Asian guys.
 

tonka

Super Vip
Joined
Apr 3, 2011
Messages
1,776
Reaction score
205
Points
63
Ugly assholes don't need to be featured, do they?
Some holes are HOT; some holes are cute and little. But then there's the hole that has been fucked a lot, and fisted a lot, and whatever a lot. Whatever it may have been, it's fugly now. Let's not feature it's fugliness.
 

absalom

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
372
Reaction score
8
Points
0
some bigger [studios] can and seem to constantly dish out an endless stream of Apollos in human form. That's why it's so strange they insist on some guys who decidedly are not attractive. If it's one on one sex, it maybe can be understandable that they didn't have another available option at the moment. But then they include them in threesomes and other -somes. I recently watched a scene featuring 5 guys. I'm not really into orgies but I watched it anyway. Four of them were at least passable, one was truly hideous. Guess who got the most screen time?!

The way you describe it sounds like the studios do this on purpose to annoy their members ....

Just like you the big studios know a goodlooking guy from a fugly one. So why do they use the fugly guys? Usually it is because he has a large dick, a hot body (minus face of course) or can keep a hard dick during the filming of a scene. Sometimes he is a last minute replacement because the original goodlooking guy did not show up or cancelled at the last minute. And lets not forget that the big studios also are on a reasonable tight filming schedule. Some people think that the big budget studios film scenes every day of the week. This is not the case. Usually a crew shoots multiple scenes for a couple of days. Some models are able to do more than one scene in two days but many are not because they have problems keeping an erection or producing a decent cumshot. They can use Viagra like substances but sometimes this results in models having great difficulties in producing a cumshot. So a studio needs a group of models to make the filming of the scenes go as smooth as possible. And this means that studios sometimes use the not so pretty models to get the scenes done.

Just out of sheer curiosity: about which orgy were you speaking?
 

efimera

New member
Joined
Oct 11, 2012
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Points
0
sounds in blowjobs are not sexy at all but funny XD
 
Top